Dominick Calhoun’s Mother Arraigned in Death of Her 4-Year-Old Son

FLINT, Mich. (CBS/AP) The mother of the 4-year-old who was allegedly beaten to death for wetting his pants was arraigned Monday in a Flint courtroom on second-degree murder charges.

PICTURES: Dominick Calhoun

Genesee County woman Corinne Baker wiped away tears with her shoulder as the judge explained the charges she faces in the death of her son Dominick Calhoun, reports The Flint Journal. No bond was set, and she remains in custody in Livingston County for breaking probation in an unrelated case.

Authorities allege that Baker, 25, willfully disregarded her son’s condition while her live-in boyfriend, Brandon Hayes, repeatedly tortured her son to death for wetting his pants in their apartment.

Baker reportedly told police she was afraid to report the abuse, thinking she would be blamed or charged with violating her probation for a 2008 drug conviction by being in an environment with illegal drugs, moving without notifying officials of her new address and associating with Hayes, a person with a prior felony conviction, reports The Flint Journal.

Brandon Hayes is being charged with torture and first degree murder for the death of Dominick Calhoun. The accident reportedly occurred April 8, and Hayes allegedly tortured the 4-year-old over a period of four days.

Dominick’s body was found Sunday, April 11 on the floor of the apartment. The young boy was taken off life support the following day.

Megan Calhoun, Dominick’s aunt who attended Monday’s arraignment, plans to attend as many hearings as she can emotionally handle. “I just want justice to be served,” she told The Flint Journal. She said she loved Dominick and wishes she could “see him grow up.”

MEDIA
PICTURES: Dominick Calhoun

 

MORE ON CRIMESIDER
April 16, 2010 -Dominick Calhoun (PICTURES): 4-Year-Old Allegedly Tortured to Death for Wetting Pants

 

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola: Another Male Hating Judge..

Whoa..

A judge does what ?

The case would come as no surprise to Bob Simpson, 48, who got divorced in June 2008. At the time, he said his lawyer advised him to keep his mouth shut because the “judge hates men.”

Ah yes, the politically correct female male-hating judge. Is that NEW, F..king NO !!

But there is more..

Even the children caught in their parents’ crossfire question why Probate Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola appears to rule against fathers even where experts have found the father to be the better parent under court-established guidelines.

But, but..Women are more “feeling” more in touch with their “humanity” they are the world’s imaginary communicators and the only vassal of sympathy, love, empathy..

They alone know children and what is good for them. Just ask any woman, they just know !!

Anyway, dreams and feminist theory aside let’s have a look at reality..

Some feel judge has bias against men

By Lisa Roose-Church • DAILY PRESS & ARGUS • September 13, 2009

  • The battle between men and women is old — but in one Livingston County courtroom, men say the judge doesn’t give them a fighting chance.
  • Even the children caught in their parents’ crossfire question why Probate Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola appears to rule against fathers even where experts have found the father to be the better parent under court-established guidelines.

    “I felt like I wanted to scream, just to get it out of my system,” former Howell resident Chloe Basa, 9, said after learning Garagiola ordered her to live in Arkansas with her mother, despite psychologist and attorney reports that said it was in the child’s best interest to live with her father.

    The Michigan Court of Appeals eventually found that Garagiola “abused (her) discretion” when she ruled to change Chloe Basa’s living arrangements, and that her “reliance on case law was misplaced.” The case now returns to Garagiola, who has scheduled a hearing Thursday.

    The case would come as no surprise to Bob Simpson, 48, who got divorced in June 2008. At the time, he said his lawyer advised him to keep his mouth shut because the “judge hates men.”

    Simpson, who said there were no claims of domestic violence or wrongdoing from either side in the divorce, said he did not believe his attorney until Garagiola routinely ruled against him even when his ex-wife violated their divorce agreement by relocating out of the county, which was prohibited.

    “I feel screwed,” he said. “I’m afraid to go before (Garagiola) because I’m a man. I feel like a Negro … in 1964 Mississippi. … I feel like there is prejudice going on here.”

    Court rules say Garagiola cannot discuss specific cases with the media, but she did say she stands by her custody decisions.

    “It saddens me to hear that is a perception, but when you deal with domestic violence and take a strong position with it, that is very often the response you get,” the judge said. “I don’t go in there with predetermined anything. Put the evidence on, and I will apply the law to it.”

    Yet, the Michigan Court of Appeals found that Garagiola did not properly apply the law in the Basa case.

    Attorney Kevin Gentry, who represents Andrew Basa, declined to speak about the pending case, but said he relies on his court filings.

    In those court papers, Gentry said Garagiola abused her discretion by ignoring or misinterpreting facts and ignoring court-appointed expert witnesses. He also alleged she denied due process to fathers by not allowing them to put on a defense or cross-examine witnesses.

    Gentry also represents another father who is fighting for his children under similar circumstances to the Basa case. This second case is pending in the Court of Appeals.

    Gentry said there appears to be a question about whether guardian ad litem (GAL) will be used as Garagiola’s “rejection of the recommendations of the various GALs and court-appointed experts in a number of cases have recently led to considerable dissension in the local bar,” according to court documents filed in the Michigan Court of Appeals.

    A GAL — which is a traditional practice in the family court — is a court-appointed attorney for the children in a custody dispute case.

    Garagiola said that she sometimes disagrees with the court-appointed experts, but she denied ignoring their recommendations.

    “The easiest thing in the world would be just go along with whatever anybody says and don’t make waves,” she said. “That’s not what I was elected to do. People who have had decisions they don’t like will argue to the Court of Appeals and anyone who will listen that they were wronged and (my) decisions were wrong.

    “If I’m picking and choosing from testimony and ignoring other testimony … I’ll be reversed as fast as you can open the mail,” she added.

    The better parent

    The appeals court said throughout its opinion in the Basa case that Garagiola’s analysis and decision goes “against the great weight” of the testimony presented.

    The courts determine the “better” parent based on 12 factors the judge and various court-appointed representatives use to evaluate the parents.

    Those factors include how the parents interact and are bonded with their children; the moral fitness of both parents; their willingness to work with the other; and mental and physical health of both parents, among others.

    The Daily Press & Argus randomly reviewed about three dozen divorce or child-custody cases assigned to Garagiola and learned that, in some of her cases, the judge deemed the father unsuitable to have custody of his children either because of allegations of domestic violence, alcohol or substance abuse, mental illness, lack of financial support, or similar reasons. In these cases, Garagiola granted physical custody to the mother and gave the father visitation.

    Yet in some cases where the mother appears unsuitable due to alcohol or substance abuse, mental illness or other issues, Garagiola still awarded custody to the mother, even when the children’s court-appointed attorneys, social worker, psychologists or Friend of the Court determine the mother is the less-desirable parent.

    Garagiola said she cannot talk about the specifics of individual cases.

    “I feel I was labeled by the judge in a negative manner,” Andrew Basa said after his son and daughter were taken from him. “Everything was one-sided in (my ex-wife’s) favor. In all honesty, I don’t think I was given beyond a reasonable doubt in anything or that anything I said was taken to heart.”

    Andrew Basa said his ex-wife, Carleen Gautz, had custody of the children and he paid child support, once falling behind when he lost his job due to downsizing, but he caught up. He said his ex-wife gave him custody of their children in 2007 because she was moving to Arkansas to live with her parents because she told him she was about to become homeless.

    Andrew Basa and his current wife, Amy, have a letter that his ex-wife wrote in which she encourages Garagiola to give him custody of Chloe and Karl.

    “The judge would not consider it,” he said.

    Carlene Gautz testified at a hearing that she felt she had no choice because it was it either move “or become homeless” due to financial difficulties.

    However, court documents state that Gautz voluntarily left a full-time job with the University of Michigan Brighton Health Center, where she was making $11.66 an hour, to move to Arkansas to be with her parents. About two months after relocating, Gautz found a job paying her $16 an hour.

    Both the judge and Gautz chastised Andrew Basa for frequently changing jobs, Gentry said.

    “In reality, his history reveals that whenever he was laid off from a position, he usually quickly secured a new one and then advanced to full-time status and higher rank,” Gentry wrote in court documents.

    The appeals court agreed with Gentry, and said Garagiola erred when the judge “overemphasized (Gautz’s) improved life in Arkansas instead of focusing on the benefits to the children from the move.”

    “Instead of focusing on defendant’s failure and plaintiff’s improved financial stability, the trial court should have focused its analysis on whether a $4.34 hourly wage increase and proximity to plaintiff’s parents had the capacity to improve the children’s lives, even though the move would result in a loss of the continued presence” of their father in their everyday lives, the appeals court opinion stated.

    Gentry said Garagiola found Andrew Basa’s living with his father as “unstable,” but considered Gautz’s living with her parents as “improving her stability.” He said the judge found Andrew Basa’s layoffs to mean he was “economically unstable,” but the judge dismisses Gautz quitting a financially stable job as a necessity.

    Chloe Basa said she told Garagiola that she felt abandoned by her mother, but the judge ignored her feelings.

    Gautz even acknowledged that Chloe felt she had been abandoned by her mother’s move, but the judge takes issue with the children’s court-appointed attorney as well as their therapist using that same characterization.

    Garagiola dismissed the experts’ opinions, saying she found Gautz was “demonstrating responsible and necessary behavior” under the circumstances, according to the judge’s August 2008 order granting Gautz permission to relocate her children to Arkansas.

    The judge further notes that she found it “concerning” that Andrew Basa, Amy Basa and none of the professionals involved in the case had helped the children understand their mother’s move to Arkansas was anything but abandonment.

    “While ‘abandonment’ is the children’s experience, that is not the reality of the circumstances of mother’s move to Arkansas, as the move was motivated by financial necessity,” the judge wrote in her opinion.

    However, the appeals court took Garagiola to task, saying her ruling “failed to consider Chloe’s feelings of abandonment” by her mother.

    A father’s value

    Experts agree that children need their fathers in their lives.

    “Too often, the system looks at the mother and assumes the mother is solely responsible for upkeep,” said Debi Cain, executive director of the Michigan Domestic Violence Prevention and Treatment Board. “The bottom line is, for the best interest (of children), it’s most advantageous if a caring and active father is in their life as well.”

    Cain says that in any courtroom across the state, there is an equal number of women making the same complaint about a judge being prejudiced against her.

    “The reality is, we expect the people who make those recommendations to be experts in everything — alcohol abuse, drug abuse, child abuse and neglect,” she said. “We expect them to understand sexual violence in the family. The truth is, in my experience, the reality is that most professionals have very little training (in those) issues. The reality is, the evaluations are only as good as the people who make them.”

    When asked why the court system bothers to use GALs to make recommendations, Cain replied: “Whatever they offer is that much more information (for a judge to consider).”

    However, Cain said, the reality is that the judge, attorneys or GALs may not ever get a “complete picture.”

    Waiting on answers

    Meanwhile, Andrew Basa continues his fight for his children while trying to enjoy the moments, like Christmas, that he gets with his children.

    He said he is cautious about the appeals court’s ruling because the family must still return to Garagiola’s courtroom for her revised analysis of his case.

    Amy Basa said the couple is disheartened to learn Chloe and Karl are not receiving the court-ordered counseling on a regular basis and that their mother is mostly absent from their upbringing.

    “Their mom is at school all day Monday through Thursday, so she’s really there for them only on Friday and weekends,” she said. “Their grandma and grandpa put them to bed and feed them. Their grandma and grandpa are raising them.”

    Those factors include how the parents interact and are bonded with their children; the moral fitness of both parents; their willingness to work with the other; and mental and physical health of both parents, among others.

    The Daily Press & Argus randomly reviewed about three dozen divorce or child-custody cases assigned to Garagiola and learned that, in some of her cases, the judge deemed the father unsuitable to have custody of his children either because of allegations of domestic violence, alcohol or substance abuse, mental illness, lack of financial support, or similar reasons. In these cases, Garagiola granted physical custody to the mother and gave the father visitation.

    Yet in some cases where the mother appears unsuitable due to alcohol or substance abuse, mental illness or other issues, Garagiola still awarded custody to the mother, even when the children’s court-appointed attorneys, social worker, psychologists or Friend of the Court determine the mother is the less-desirable parent.

    Garagiola said she cannot talk about the specifics of individual cases.

    “I feel I was labeled by the judge in a negative manner,” Andrew Basa said after his son and daughter were taken from him. “Everything was one-sided in (my ex-wife’s) favor. In all honesty, I don’t think I was given beyond a reasonable doubt in anything or that anything I said was taken to heart.”

    Andrew Basa said his ex-wife, Carleen Gautz, had custody of the children and he paid child support, once falling behind when he lost his job due to downsizing, but he caught up. He said his ex-wife gave him custody of their children in 2007 because she was moving to Arkansas to live with her parents because she told him she was about to become homeless.

    Andrew Basa and his current wife, Amy, have a letter that his ex-wife wrote in which she encourages Garagiola to give him custody of Chloe and Karl.

    “The judge would not consider it,” he said.

    Carlene Gautz testified at a hearing that she felt she had no choice because it was it either move “or become homeless” due to financial difficulties.

    However, court documents state that Gautz voluntarily left a full-time job with the University of Michigan Brighton Health Center, where she was making $11.66 an hour, to move to Arkansas to be with her parents. About two months after relocating, Gautz found a job paying her $16 an hour.

    Both the judge and Gautz chastised Andrew Basa for frequently changing jobs, Gentry said.

    “In reality, his history reveals that whenever he was laid off from a position, he usually quickly secured a new one and then advanced to full-time status and higher rank,” Gentry wrote in court documents.

    The appeals court agreed with Gentry, and said Garagiola erred when the judge “overemphasized (Gautz’s) improved life in Arkansas instead of focusing on the benefits to the children from the move.”

    “Instead of focusing on defendant’s failure and plaintiff’s improved financial stability, the trial court should have focused its analysis on whether a $4.34 hourly wage increase and proximity to plaintiff’s parents had the capacity to improve the children’s lives, even though the move would result in a loss of the continued presence” of their father in their everyday lives, the appeals court opinion stated.

    Gentry said Garagiola found Andrew Basa’s living with his father as “unstable,” but considered Gautz’s living with her parents as “improving her stability.” He said the judge found Andrew Basa’s layoffs to mean he was “economically unstable,” but the judge dismisses Gautz quitting a financially stable job as a necessity.

    Chloe Basa said she told Garagiola that she felt abandoned by her mother, but the judge ignored her feelings.

    Gautz even acknowledged that Chloe felt she had been abandoned by her mother’s move, but the judge takes issue with the children’s court-appointed attorney as well as their therapist using that same characterization.

    Garagiola dismissed the experts’ opinions, saying she found Gautz was “demonstrating responsible and necessary behavior” under the circumstances, according to the judge’s August 2008 order granting Gautz permission to relocate her children to Arkansas.

    The judge further notes that she found it “concerning” that Andrew Basa, Amy Basa and none of the professionals involved in the case had helped the children understand their mother’s move to Arkansas was anything but abandonment.

    “While ‘abandonment’ is the children’s experience, that is not the reality of the circumstances of mother’s move to Arkansas, as the move was motivated by financial necessity,” the judge wrote in her opinion.

    However, the appeals court took Garagiola to task, saying her ruling “failed to consider Chloe’s feelings of abandonment” by her mother.

    Daily Press & Argus reporter Lisa Roose-Church at (517) 552-2846 or at lrchurch@gannett.com.

     

    Share this:
    Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
    Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment